ledgersmb.org site content review && proposed actions
Hi,
While evaluating the site statistics for ledgersmb.org (I was looking if there's anything we can/should do better to help people "find" LedgerSMB), I found a number of pages which definitely could use some love. See (some) of my findings below.
Two questions: 1. What about the proposed actions? 2. Who can volunteer to address these issues/execute these proposed actions?
My finding:
Large number of hits, but 96% bounce rate:
https://ledgersmb.org/faq/what-difference-between-sales-invoice-and-sales-or...
What would be the reason people hit this page? Because of accounting
problems of their own? Or because they're searching for an accounting system? If people simply have accounting questions, can we get a lower bounce rate? Or will we simply have to accept that this is the best we can do? If anything, it looks like this page could use some reading hints (paragraph headings, etc) applied.
Not as many hits as some other pages, but still quite a few, but 100% bounce rate: https://ledgersmb.org/contributed-resources
The page content doesn't feel too relevant. Anybody with more relevant
content?
Outdated, with quite a few hits, but 100% bounce rate:
https://ledgersmb.org/faq/localization-internationalization/how-can-i-transl...
This page could really do with an update.
Empty pages with 100% bounce rate: http://ledgersmb.org/faq/invoicing-0 http://ledgersmb.org/faq/void http://ledgersmb.org/faq/end-life http://ledgersmb.org/faq/support-0 http://ledgersmb.org/faq/bank-account https://ledgersmb.org/faq/utf-8 https://ledgersmb.org/faq/10 https://ledgersmb.org/faq/11 https://ledgersmb.org/faq/102 https://ledgersmb.org/faq/20 http://ledgersmb.org/faq/macos-x http://ledgersmb.org/faq/redhat-enterprise-linux https://ledgersmb.org/faq/accounts-receivable-0
Can/Should we remove these? Or should we make sure they'll get some
content?
participants (1)
-
Erik Huelsmann