Sorry, forgot to send to the mailing list as well... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Robert J. Clay <rjclay@gmail.com> Date: Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 2:30 PM Subject: Re: [ledgersmb-devel] ledgersmb project owned repository naming To: David Godfrey <info@sbts.com.au> David, On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 6:43 AM, David Godfrey <info@sbts.com.au> wrote:

Currently we have 30 repositories in the LedgerSMB github project. over half of them are related to PGObject modules and are reasonably named in the form of PGObject-foo-bar

However, not all of our repositories are named so sensibly.

In particular we now have 4 "packaging" repositories .... - lsmb-overlay

...., while the fourth is the new repo Chris has added for gentoo packaging.

For an 'ebuild' for Gentoo, which is not quite the same thing... (A "package" for gentoo looks to be just an application source archive, which an 'ebuild' for that app uses to build and install the application as necessary.)

Some examples .... - pkg-gentoo-LedgerSMB

An "overlay" is not a package it's an ebuild and having the word "overlay' in the repo name for them is very commonly related to Gentoo. (Or so it seems to be judging from a search on GitHub...) -- Robert J. Clay rjclay@gmail.com -- Robert J. Clay rjclay@gmail.com